Directed Against Jailalita

So they can not be summoned again.
The alleged case of disproportionate assets by 66 million between 1991 and 1996 is to accumulate assets. This is the case in the court of Delhi.
She had expressed fears that the fair hearing of their case can not be in Tamil Nadu, after which the court had been the case outside Tamil Nadu Sthanatrit.
He alleged that the DMK government of [then] is trying to frame him in false cases. Trial court on October 21 that he had directed him to be present again tomorrow because the inquiry did not have a conclusion. The two-day hearing on October 20 and 21 of the 567 questions were answered.
He said the Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption jewelery, shoes, slippers and more worth of goods recorded Chadi. Their saris were all seized.
She told the court that the Directorate of time aking their statement about the prices of the saris were totally wrong figure. Supreme Court Order of 19 October after he was presented to the trial court. Top court to postpone the hearing for some time his application was rejected.
The apex court Karnataka during her court appearance was directed to provide adequate protection. She made arrangements for police protection were widespread. However, the 'Z plus' security is obtained.